Republicans ratcheted up their accusations that Democrats are overplaying their impeachment hand after courtroom filings from the Home Judiciary Committee indicated the 2 articles of impeachment adopted final week could solely be the start.

GOP lawmakers already had been fuming at Speaker Nancy Pelosi over her shock resolution to delay transmitting the articles to the Senate in a bid to extract favorable phrases for President Trump’s trial. However within the newest twist, the Democrat-led Judiciary panel referenced the potential of but further impeachment articles in briefs filed Monday associated to their quest for testimony from former White Home Counsel Don McGahn and secret grand jury materials from former Particular Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.


If the courtroom permits them to acquire the data they search, their lawyer wrote, “new articles of impeachment” may very well be thought of based mostly on the proof. GOP lawmakers reacted with surprised disbelief.

“Democrats are treating impeachment as an open bar tab,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., tweeted Monday afternoon. “Time to chop them off, take their automobile keys away (put GOP in command of the Home), and finish this madness.”

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who sits on the Home Judiciary Committee that filed the briefs, reacted by saying, “You have to be kidding.”

He added: “It’s gone from the Kangaroo Courtroom Impeachment… …to the Keystone Cops Impeachment(s).. Will Pelosi ship the Articles from the final Impeachment earlier than drafting the subsequent ones?!”

The notion of latest articles of impeachment was floated because the committee justified their must have McGahn testify and purchase Mueller’s secret grand jury info. Beforehand, that they had argued that their ongoing impeachment investigation introduced an pressing want for each — however with the Home already voting to question Trump, the D.C. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals gave them till Monday afternoon to clarify why the case was nonetheless related and shouldn’t be dismissed as moot.


“If this materials reveals new proof supporting the conclusion that President Trump dedicated impeachable offenses that aren’t coated by the Articles adopted by the Home, the Committee will proceed accordingly–including, if mandatory, by contemplating whether or not to advocate new articles of impeachment,” committee lawyer Douglas Letter wrote within the grand jury materials case.

Letter used almost equivalent language pertaining to McGahn’s testimony in his temporary in that case.

Trump final week was impeached on accusations of abuse of energy and obstruction of Congress, associated to his efforts to strain Ukraine to launch politically helpful investigations, all whereas withholding army assist (although Trump has maintained there was no “quid professional quo”).

The newest filings didn’t element what potential further articles may very well be thought of. Regardless, the briefs said that even when McGahn’s testimony or the grand jury materials do not result in new articles of impeachment, they may very well be utilized in an upcoming Senate trial in relation to the obstruction of Congress allegations that Trump is presently dealing with.