In reflecting on the impeachment hearings, Home Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., reportedly pointed to a selected alternate that confirmed for him that President Trump “does not give a s–t” about what’s good for the US.

These feedback got here throughout an interview with the New Yorker journal on Thursday, the identical day Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urged Democrats to proceed with articles of impeachment, following a number of public hearings on Trump’s conduct with Ukraine.

In response to Schiff, David Holmes, a U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, make clear Trump’s selfishness when he revealed that the president informed Ambassador Gordon Sondland that the president solely cared a few potential investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden — not different Ukraine-related points, like a possible warfare with Russia.

“That claims all of it,” Schiff reportedly stated. “The President doesn’t give a s–t about what’s good for our nation, what’s good for Ukraine. It’s all about what’s in it for him personally and for his reelection marketing campaign.”

EMBASSY OFFICIAL GIVES COLORFUL ACCOUNT OF OVERHEARD TRUMP CALL: ‘LOUD AND RECOGNIZABLE’

Schiff’s feedback have been simply the newest salvo in an ongoing feud between him and the president, as each accused the opposite of egregious abuses of energy. Trump has even requested that Schiff himself testify within the ongoing impeachment inquiry hearings.

Extra from Media

“There are members of Congress who could also be reality witnesses. I’m not certainly one of them,” Schiff stated throughout Thursday’s interview.

He additionally appeared to dismiss assaults from the president, claiming that “the president’s technique with every thing is mainly the identical: don’t defend his misconduct, assault whoever stands as much as him.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

It is unclear whether or not Pelosi can have sufficient votes to make Trump the third president impeached in U.S. historical past. But when she did, Schiff indicated that obstruction of justice would simply make it into the articles of impeachment.

“You could possibly not have a extra open-and-shut case of obstruction of Congress,” he stated, referring to the administration’s refusal to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry.